Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard Krapf, Doing Business as Krapf Trucking Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 7, 1961No. 13220PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dated March 7,1960, directing a convicted defendant, the appellant, Krapf, to submit himself to the United States Marshal at Newark for the purpose of being fingerprinted. The facts follow.
On July 15, 1959, the United States filed a criminal information containing twelve counts, charging Krapf, doing business as Krapf Trucking Service, with violating Section 222(a) of the Motor Carrier’s Chapter of the Interstate Commerce Act, Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 322(a), 1 in that he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. AmorosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Riss & Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- In re NeagleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Fairh RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. KalishDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1967
- Maurice C. Stevenson v. United States of America, Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.