Legal Opinion

Medical Mutual of Ohio v. Schlotterer, Unpublished Decision (1-10-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2008No. 89388UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} In this appeal brought pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and (A)(3), defendant-appellant William Schlotterer, D.O. ("the doctor"), appeals from the order of the trial court that directed him to respond to a discovery request made by plaintiff-appellee Medical Mutual of Ohio ("Med Mutual"), and, further, directed him to sign "The Agreed Qualified Protective Order" submitted by Med Mutual. The foregoing order would permit disclosure by the doctor of matters otherwise covered by R.C.2317.02(B)(1), i.e., the physician-patient testimonial privilege.

{¶ 2} The doctor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SmorgalaOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. The V Cos. v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jackson v. GregerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Medical Board v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Grove v. Northeast Ohio Nephrology Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API