Legal Opinion
Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Chrome Specialties, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 22, 1997No. 96-C-925PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
This trademark infringement action was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge William E. Callahan. On January 13, 1997, the plaintiffs, Harley-Davidson Motor Company and H-D Michigan, Inc. [collectively “Harley-Davidson”] filed a “Motion for a Preliminary or Permanent Injunction” and asked that the motion be referred to a district judge for resolution because the parties had not consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The matter was then assigned to this *251district court for purposes of addressing the application for injunctive relief.
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ellicott MacHine Corporation v. Modern Welding Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Dewey v. BechtholdDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019