Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Phelps, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal has been made by the appellee on the ground that it was not taken within two months from the date of the judgment, which was rendered on the 6th of December, 1899. The record does show that the appeal was taken on June 27th, 1900, but the affidavits filed satisfy us that an order to enter an appeal.was signed by the attorney for the appellant and left by him in the clerk’s office on the 3rd day of January, 1900. Mr. Clendinen, the attorney, swears positively and unequivocally, than he did leave such an order on that date with one of the clerks in the office who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guest v. Commissioners of Church HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Gaines v. LamkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Humphreys v. SlemonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Gutowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Bright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Rockland Bleach & Dye Works, Co., Inc. v. Hj Williams Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API