Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chandler v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 2014No. CV-14-369Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice

I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that an attorney who has failed to timely pay the annual fee required to maintain his attorney’s license is an eligible candidate for circuit judge in this state under amendment 11fi80, § 16(B) to the Arkansas Constitution. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in my dissent in Kelly v. Martin, 2014 Ark. 217, 433 S.W.3d 896, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Appellee H.G. Foster is an eligible candidate for circuit judge.

I also dissent from the majority’s declaration that “Rule VII(C) is unconstitutional to the extent that it provides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Tsann Kuen Enterprises Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Miller v. Arkansas Department of Finance & AdministrationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Kelly v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API