Legal Opinion

(PS) Creel v. Glenn County

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 11, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01327Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHAD MICHAEL CREEL, No. 2:25-cv-1327 DAD AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER and 13 GLENN COUNTY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the 17 undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. 19 § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) will therefore be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API