Legal Opinion

St. Anthony Motor Company v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1928No. 27,026PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was in the employ of plaintiff as an automobile salesman from February, 1922, until August, 1926, under an agreement by which he was to receive as compensation specified commissions on the sales which he made. During the first summer he drew his commissions as he earned them and received no advances on commissions prior to the time they had been earned. In the winter business was slack and commissions few, and an arrangement was made by which he was allowed to draw advances against commissions to be earned thereafter. An account was kept in which he was charged with these advances…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salvas v. RappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Skweres v. Diamond Craft Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Hibbs-Kiefer Hat Company v. SchneiderhanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Leighton v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. St. Cloud Aviation, Inc. v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Salvas v. RappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API