Kopp v. Fair Political Practices Commission
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the judgment.
I agree with the Chief Justice and Justices Mosk and Werdegar that this court may not issue a writ of mandate commanding *679enforcement of Proposition 73 and that we may not reform Proposition 73 to avoid constitutional infirmity. Unlike my colleagues, however, I do not base these conclusions on a determination that Proposition 73 is not amenable to judicial reformation (although I would so determine were I to reach that question) but on the far simpler ground that we must give full faith and credit to the federal judgment that has…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.