Legal Opinion
United States v. Peeples
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2010No. 10-30338PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Defendant Robert Peeples (“Peeples”) appeals the district court’s denial of his constitutional challenge to his conditions of release imposed pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (“Walsh Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the district court’s order.
I
On July 23, 2010, the government indicted Peeples on a charge of knowing receipt of child pornography. The indictment alleges that, between December 2007 and February 2010, Peeples knowingly received child pornography by using the internet while located in…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. KarperDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. CallDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- United States v. BlaserDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- United States v. CampbellUnited States District Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.