Legal Opinion
State v. Langelier
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 3, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
Indictment for sodomy. Defendant demurred specially on the ground that the indictment did not allege an assault upon the person with whom the offense was committed. Another ground for demurrer was alleged but not pressed, the defense conceding that it was without merit.
The late case of State v. Cyr, 135 Me., 513, 198 A., 743, points out that,
“By the weight of recent authority apparently supported by better reasoning, sodomy as used in connection with statutes prohibiting the crime against nature is interpreted in its broad sense and held to include all acts of unnatural carnal copulation with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. BusheySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
- State v. ConantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- State v. CastoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- State v. McParlinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- State v. McFarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Washington v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.