Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Shell Oil Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 22, 2004No. 09-03-325-CVPublished

1DissentDon Burgess, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The seminal case on this issue is In re Masonite Corp., 997 S.W.2d 194 (Tex.1999). Masonite was a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Enoch. Justice Enoch acknowledged:

Our mandamus standards are well-established. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy available only when there is an abuse of discretion and no adequate appellate remedy. [See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833 (Tex.1992).] Generally, an appellate remedy is adequate even though it involves delay and more expense than obtaining an extraordinary writ. [See id. at 842; see also CSR Ltd. v. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591, 597…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Masonite Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API