People v. Warren
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is conceded that the evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict, but certain errors are urged which we will notice in the order presented in defendant’s brief. It is claimed that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, for the reason that the personal property alleged to have been stolen is not described with sufficient certainty. The description is "four calves, then and there the personal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- People v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- State v. FriendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. BondIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- James v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. Ye FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- State v. JurkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.