Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1979No. 4670-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

The appellant, Lawrence Clyde Price, was convicted in 1978 of the sale of heroin. Since the state tried appellant on the theory of aiding and abetting, the conviction was reversed on appeal because of improper jury instructions on the issue of intent. From this ruling the state does not petition for review and we concur with that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion. The state petitioned for review, however, on the issue of whether it was error to admit evidence of a request by appellant, subsequent to the sale, for a “taste” of the heroin. We have jurisdiction pursuant to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. HardinArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. McFallArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. TuellArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. AvilaArizona Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API