Legal Opinion
In Re Mordkin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 26, 2011No. 10-01094Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE AMENDED OBJECTION OF ALPINE BANK TO DEBTOR’S CLAIM OF EXEMPTIONS (SCHEDULE C)
S. MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
This addresses the objection of Alpine Bank to the debtor’s exemption pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-572 of certain unpaid compensation. For the reasons that follow, I will sustain Alpine Bank’s objection.
I
On November 3, 2011, the debtor commenced the above-captioned case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and filed his schedules (Dkt. No. 1). Pursuant to § 522(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor may exempt from the bankruptcy estate either (1) the property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Beaner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Riendeau v. Canney (In Re Riendeau)District Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- District of Columbia v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.