Legal Opinion

Dukat v. Leiserv, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1998No. S-96-1257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

This is a petition for further review of the Nebraska Court of Appeals’ order of reversal and remand for a new trial on the negligence claim of appellant, Rebecca S. Dukat, against appellee, Leiserv, Inc., doing business as Mockingbird Lanes. Leiserv asserts that the Court of Appeals erred in determining that the trial court should not have instructed the jury on the theory of assumption of risk. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Dukat arrived at Mockingbird Lanes, a bowling alley in Omaha, Nebraska, at approximately 6 p.m. on February 2, 1994, to bowl in her league games. Dukat walked from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Schwab v. Allou CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. McDermott v. Platte County Agricultural SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Scharmann v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Springer v. BohlingNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hughes v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hughes v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API