Ruben Rosales v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID, Justice.
A jury instruction setting forth the elements of attempted murder must inform the jury that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, with specific intent to kill the victim, engaged in conduct constituting a substantial step toward such killing. Spradlin v. State, 569 N.E.2d 948, 950 (Ind.1991). Similarly, when attempted murder is premised on accomplice liability, the jury is required to be instructed that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with specific intent to kill. Hopkins v. State, 759 N.E.2d 633, 637…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Bethel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Carltez Taylor v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Strickland v. GoguenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Pemberton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- United States v. Victor Hernandez-MontesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Dorian Lee v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.