Government of the Virgin Islands v. Eurie Joseph
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge
At issue in this ease is whether a second hearsay statement made by the victim of a homicide is admissible under the analysis of the Confrontation Clause set forth in Idaho v. Wright, 110 S. Ct. 3139 (1990).
I
Procedural Posture and Factual History
On December 24, 1990, a five count information was filed charging Eurie Joseph with felony murder in violation of V.I. Code Ann. tit. 14, § 922(a)(2) (1964); premeditated murder in violation of V.I. Code Ann. tit. 14, § 922(a)(1) (1964); possession of an unlicensed firearm in a crime of violence in violation of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1761, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1158 Linda S. Walden James P. Murphy George C. Poirier v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. Virgil H. Gardner Michael A. Vidan Howard Schutte David M. Watson Curt Riggin Robert Lindsey James R. Hurd Felmer Cummins George Foster Rich Moody John Doe Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.