Legal Opinion

Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1889No. 2514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Ford.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Presiding Judge.

This suit was brought by appellee to recover damages for injury to land and crops alleged to have been caused by overflow water being held upon his land during overflows in the years 1884 and 1885. It was alleged that the water was detained upon his land for several weeks longer during the overflow of each year than it would have been but for the negligent and improper construction of appellant’s road bed. Appellee alleged that he had ten acres of land in cultivation, and laid his damages at 1892. The trial was by jury, and resulted in verdict and judgment for $159.60.

Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. SchofieldTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Smith v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Shell Pipe Line Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Boyett v. EndersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. M. A. Cooper & Co. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API