Legal Opinion

Shell Pipe Line Corp. v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1934No. 7902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for $500 as damages to two acres of land, and for $50 as damages to crops growing thereon, alleging 'that he had constructed a ditch and embankment on his land to protect certain parts of his fax-m fi'om washing and overflow; that pri- or to September 1, 1929, appellant, under a pipe line right of way gi’ant frota appellee, dug a ditch and constructed a pipe line across appellee’s farm, which intersected the drainage ditch and embankment; that appellant failed to properly repair and maintain the drainage ditch and embankment at the point it intersected…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railroad v. PapeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. County of Harris v. GerhartTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Smith v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Walker v. Salt Flat Water Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. StoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Geotech Energy Corp. v. Gulf States Telecommunications and Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Burlington-Rock Island R. Co. v. NewsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. TurnbowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API