Legal Opinion

Beaman v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1997No. 55A04-9611-CV-485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

James and Judith Beaman and Lloyd and Kathryn Jordan (collectively, “Lot Owners”) appeal the grant of Wilson and Doris Smith’s motion for summary judgment on the Lot Owners’ action to quiet title to a certain piece of land. We affirm.

FACTS

Irwin Lewis and his wife Edith owned about 1.82 acres of real estate adjacent to the City of Martinsville. On June 26, 1969, they executed a plat to “subdivide the same into lots in accordance with the ... plat” and establish “restrictions, provisions and conditions as a part of said Plat and Subdivision.” (R. 99).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Debolt v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Hermann v. YaterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. National Board of Examiners for Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. American Osteopathic Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Czaja v. City of ButlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poznic v. Porter County Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Eck & Associates, Inc. v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Bass v. SalyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Noble County ex rel. Noble County Board of Commissioners v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API