Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Bowen

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 19, 1987No. 85 C8470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Seymour Weinstein (“Wein-stein”), brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment which were referred to a magistrate for a Report and Recommendation. Objections to the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation were filed by the Secretary and the matter is now ripe for the court’s consideration. For the reasons stated herein, the court grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

F…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Gaynell McCuin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Ethel M. Munsinger v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Powell v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. Joy HALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Hatfield v. BowenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API