Legal Opinion

Copsey v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1986No. 937, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The mushrooming case law on double jeopardy over the last several decades has treated almost exclusively the subtleties and nuances emerging on the far periphery of that complex subject—collateral estoppel, multiple-jurisdiction prosecutions, prosecutorial overreaching, etc. The present appeal, by way of contrast, touches the core value of that law. Whereas frequently we are confronting strained attenuations of the invigorating principle, we are looking here at the very paradigm of the double jeopardy protection.

“Double jeopardy” was a convenient umbrella term adopted by Sir…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Beatty v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. FerrellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Vizcon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API