Legal Opinion
Pollack v. Calimag
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 27, 1990No. 89-0691PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
Dr. David Calimag, owner of the Pain Relief Clinic of Racine (PRC), appeals the trial court's ruling that the business arrangement between him and Dr. Richard Pollack was a dealership under the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL), ch. 135, Stats. Because the arrangement lacked crucial elements of a dealership, we reverse that portion of the judgment.
Pollack cross appeals, mainly challenging the jury's finding that the parties' covenant not to compete was valid and enforceable. We conclude that the covenant, a reasonable and enforceable one, was breached. We therefore affirm this portion of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Chuck Wagon Catering, Inc. v. RaduegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. Girl Scouts of United States of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Weber v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Nalco Chemical Company v. Hydro Technologies, Incorporated, Daniel H. Girmscheid and Thomas S. BrogeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- General Medical Corp. v. KobsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.