Legal Opinion

Gorman v. South Carolina Reinsurance Facility

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 18, 1999No. 2926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge:

This appeal involves whether an adult adoption qualifies a person as a “parent” under South Carolina Code section 38-77-590 such that the adoptive parent may receive a transfer of “designated producer” status from the South Carolina Reinsurance Facility (Facility). The Facility Board of Governors *698(Board) declined to approve a transfer of designated producer status to Jack P. Gorman, who became the “parent” of a designated producer through adult adoptive proceedings. Gorman appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court reversed the Board’s decision. The Facility appeals. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of BennettsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Lester v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. Richland Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API