Legal Opinion

Oakland California Towel Co. v. Zanes

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1947No. Civ. 13369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for breach of contract arising from defendant’s failure to return linen supplied to defendant under a written contract. Claim was also made for attorney’s fees chargeable to defendant under the express terms of the contract. Judgment went to plaintiff for $2,018.01, and attorney’s fees assessed at $225.

The appeal presents the single issue whether the tags prepared by plaintiff showing the delivery and return of linen supplied by plaintiff were admissible in evidence, or more specifically whether, on the evidence depicting the method of preparation, the use and acceptance of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Doyle v. Chief Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Ducat v. GoldnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Hancock v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Standard Oil Co. of California v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Exclusive Florists, Inc. v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API