State v. Hunziker
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Robert C. Hunziker was convicted of felony criminal damage to property and misdemeanor theft and ordered to pay restitution. On appeal, Hunziker contends that the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered restitution for items other than the fair market value of the damaged property. In addition, Hunziker contends that the court erred when it included the vie tim’s attorney fees in the restitution order. Finally, Hunziker contends that the trial court wrongly failed to consider his other financial obligations before imposing the restitution order. We affirm in part, reverse…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. ApplegateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- State v. YostSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- State v. SammonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003