Legal Opinion

State v. Earl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 2005No. A04-1328PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Christopher Jacob Earl appeals his conviction of ten counts of first-degree murder in connection with the April 28, 2003, deaths of Hollis Chromey and her children, Jerrod and Katie Zapzal-ka, in Long Prairie, Minnesota. Earl bases his appeal on four issues: (1) whether the district court erred in admitting into evidence Earl’s statement to police, taken after appellant had invoked his right to counsel; (2) whether the jury instructions misstated the state’s burden of proof on accomplice liability; (3) whether the evidence was sufficient to convict Earl of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Earl v. FabianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API