Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carringer v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 24, 2003No. S02Q1483Published

1DissentFletcher, Chief Justice

Because the plain language of the wrongful death statute clearly precludes the plaintiff’s claim, I dissent.

At common law, there was no right to bring a claim for wrongful death.7 Since the legislature enacted the wrongful death statute in derogation of the common law, this Court must strictly construe it.8 When the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we apply the plain meaning to the words of the statute to carry out the legislature’s intention.9 “ ‘The express language of the Act will be followed literally and no exceptions to the requirements of the Act will be read into the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Miles v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Tessmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Brown v. Liberty Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API