Legal Opinion

Joel Karnitz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2009No. 08-2100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) appeals from the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of Joel and Tanya Karnitz, who brought this action seeking a declaration that the mortgage held by Wells Fargo on their residence is invalid under Minnesota Statute § 507.02. We agree with Wells Fargo that given the undisputed facts of this case, the Karnitzes should be estopped from relying on § 507.02 to challenge the validity of the mortgage. We therefore reverse the district court’s judgment and remand with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Wells Fargo.

I

I…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. MSK EyEs Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Transamerica Insurance Group v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Anderson v. First Nat. Bank of Pine CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Engholm v. EkremNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Cardio Flow, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. Larson v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  3. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. GraikowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Taylor Corporation v. XL Insurance America, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API