Legal Opinion

Marshall v. 130 North Bedford Road Mount Kisco Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered June 25, 1999, as, after a nonjury trial and a finding that they were 80% at fault in the happening of the accident and that the third-party defendant Village of Mount Kisco was 20% at fault, and upon the parties’ stipulation on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $900,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downtown Art Co. v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Weisberg v. My Mill Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scalp & Blade, Inc. v. Advest, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Rondout Electric, Inc. v. Dover Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. City of New York v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Hegler v. Loews Roosevelt Field Cinemas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Rivera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API