Legal Opinion

Veal v. Scheiner

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarcus Gr. Christ, J.

Motion for an injunction pendente lite directing- the defendant to remove a cesspool or cesspools from the plaintiff’s property, described in paragraph 2 of the complaint.

The defendant disclaims knowledge of the existence of any cesspool on the plaintiff’s property or of the connection of said cesspool with the plumbing system of her building on the adjacent property. She does not allege any facts to support a claim of a right to the maintenance of the cesspool connection, if one should exist. In support of the contention that a cesspool connection exists, the plaintiff offers no factual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lexington & Fortieth Corp. v. CallaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Moller v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In re CohenNew York Surrogate's Court · 2004
  3. G. W. S. Service Stations, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API