Legal Opinion

Lexington & Fortieth Corp. v. Callaghan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1939PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The appellant does not, upon this appeal, challenge the findings of fact or the conclusions of law contained in the formal decision after trial of the action. The attack is confined to provisions inserted in the judgment by the justice who tried the case, after, the formal decision was signed by him and entered. The appeal is taken upon a bill of exceptions which in accordance with the provisions of rule 232 of the Rules of Civil Practice contains none of the evidence taken at the trial, since such evidence is not “ necessary to present the questions of law which are to be raised on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kane v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. McCain v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. 487 Elmwood, Inc. v. HassettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Clements v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Quinn v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API