Legal Opinion
State v. Kunze
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 2007No. 20060377PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] David Kunze appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of the offense of assaulting a correctional officer. Kunze argues his constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated when the district court ordered that he should be physically restrained with handcuffs and a waist restraining belt during his jury trial. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered that Kunze be restrained in this manner during his jury trial and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The State charged Kunze with assaulting a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Alfred Lee ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jeffery Scott DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AgueroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Nesvig v. HoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- JLY Transport v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. v. CreightonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.