Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Security Life & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1963No. 40264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

“ ‘Where a principal advances money to his agent on a drawing account against his commission to be earned as a salesman for selling merchandise, and his commission does not amount to the sum advanced, the employer can not, in the absence of an express or implied agreement, or promise to repay any excess of advances over the commissions earned, recover such excess from the employee. 2 Am. Jur. 229; Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. Wilson, 105 W. Va. 221 (141 SE 876, 57 ALR 31, 33); 2 CJ 787; 39 CJ 153. And see Fried v. Portis Hat Co., 41 Ga. App. 30 (152 SE 151).’ Smith v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. WilsfnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Fried v. Portis Bros. Hat Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Smith v. Franklin Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Foster v. Union Central Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Valdosta Roofing & Supply Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BuddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Whittier v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API