Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Lawrence

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 1922No. 7 Div. 340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

To maintain an action under Code, § 2966, for the malicious suing out of an attachment, ill will or vindictiveness need not be proved, but only the want of probable cause coupled with the unlawful act of suing out the writ. Durr v. Jackson, 59 Ala. 203; Jackson v. Smith, 75 Ala. 97; City Nat. Bank v. Jeffries, 73 Ala. 183.

Defendant’s contention is that he has proved the^ existence of probable cause for suing out the attachment, as a matter of law, by showing that it was honestly done upon the advice of learned legal counsel, based upon a full and fair statement of all the facts made by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Steed v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Durr v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Dothard v. SheidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Melvin v. ScowleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Walker v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Harris v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Irwin v. CotneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API