Legal Opinion

In Re Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings Against Breitenbach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1992No. 90-1896-JPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Judicial disciplinary proceeding; former judge suspended from exercising powers and duties of judge.

This is a review, pursuant to sec. 757.91, Stats., of the findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation of the judicial conduct panel that Jerold W. Breiten-bach be prohibited from exercising the powers and duties of a judge for a period of two years as discipline for judicial misconduct. The panel concluded that Judge Breitenbach wilfully and on an aggravated and persistent basis violated six of the standards set forth in the Code of Judicial Ethics by his conduct in the courtroom…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings Against GorensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Complaint Against SterlinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coffey’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. WJC v. Hon. Scott C. WoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Coffey’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API