Legal Opinion

Berry v. Lebus

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1922No. Civ. No. 4147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County entered after the sustaining of a general demurrer without leave to amend. John W. Shenk, J udge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the daughter of Martha C. Lebus, deceased; that her maiden name was Elizabeth Lebus; that formerly she was the wife of C. S. Holman, but subsequently married Thomas H. Berry; that she has two children, one being of the age of seventeen years and the other of the age of fourteen; that Martha C. Lebus died intestate in the city of Los Angeles in September, 1918, leaving as her only heirs at law said plaintiff and defendants Bertha Lebus, Orrie Lebus, and Clarence Lebus; that Bertha Lebus is the duly qualified and acting administratrix of the estate of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Estate of GorchakoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Security-First National Bank v. GorchakoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API