Legal Opinion

Silberman v. Blodgett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 18, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The questions of law upon which our advice is requested under the facts as stipulated concern the order and decree, of the Court of Probate for the district of Stamford approving the succession or inheritance tax as computed by the Tax Commissioner of Connecticut, and ordering the executors to pay the same to the treasurer of the State of Connecticut. Most of the items upon which the tax was imposed were intangible personal property; as to a few items tangible personal property.

Our present Succession Act, Chapter 190 of the Public Acts of 1923, does not differ in material degree from our…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Blodgett v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Dolak v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Blodgett v. Bridgeport City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Evans v. GalardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API