Legal Opinion

Inman v. Inman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 6, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Did the learned vice-chancellor correctly construe the will of Edward Inman, deceased?

Appellant, Inman’s widow, and the First National Bank of Barnegat, New Jersey — the latter was named trustee in the will — filed a bill in chancery to construe Inman’s will.

The first, second, fourth and eighth paragraphs of the will are not involved in this cause and, therefore, need not be considered. It may, however, be helpful in ascertaining testamentary intent to mark the fact that under the second paragraph the widow was, among other things, entitled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peer v. JenkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  2. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Coffin v. WatsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  4. Wills v. WillsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ash v. AshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  2. Orange First National Bank v. PreissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Tourigian v. TourigianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API