Legal Opinion
Hathaway v. Mutual Life Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington
Decided January 22, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions
This was an action at law on a life insurance policy.
1Opinion of the Court
HANFORD, District Judge.
This is an action by the beneficiaries named in a life insurance policy issued by the defendant. By a written stipulation, a jury was waived, and the case has been tried and submitted upon the pleadings, evidence, and arguments; and, upon due consideration, I find that the policy was issued by the defendant at its office in the city of New York on the 26th day of January, 1892, insuring the life of Homer M. Hathaway, of Pomeroy, in this state, for the sum of $3,000, in favor of his wife and son, who are the plaintiffs in this action. The contract is a New York…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Rosenplanter v. Provident Sav. Life Assur. Soc. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Phinney v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1895
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank Savings Life Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935