Hudgens v. Olmstead Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is a suit by the appellees to enjoin the appellants from violating a contract by which the principal appellant, C. C. Hudgens, agreed that for a period of three years he would not engage directly or indirectly in any business competitive with that of the appellees in that part of Pulaski county lying west of Hayes Street as extended southward to the county line. This appeal is from a decree in favor of the plaintiffs.
On March 29,1954, Hudgens was the principal stockholder in two corporations. One of these corporations, Eosedale Building & Supply Company, Inc., was actively conducting a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. StumboCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Valley Mortuary v. FairbanksUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Foster-Holcomb Investment Co. v. Little Rook Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Montgomery v. Arkansas Cold Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spann v. Lovett & Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Olmstead v. Rosedale Building & SupplySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Overboe v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968