Legal Opinion

Dyrdal v. Enbridge (U.S.), Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 14, 2010No. Civ. 10-1970 (RHK/LIB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action arises out of a $40,000 arbitration award in favor of Petitioners Dono van and Anna Dyrdal (“the Dyrdals”) and against Respondent Enbridge (U.S.), Inc. (“Enbridge”). The Dyrdals have filed a Petition asjdng the Court to modify the award by (1) adding $8,666 in interest and (2) “correcting” it to clarify that it does not include certain types of damages. They ask the Court to then confirm the so-modified award. Enbridge has responded, inter alia, by moving to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Federated National Holding Company, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API