Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Amoco Oil Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1979No. 78-632, 78-633 consPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

These consolidated cases involve the trial court’s granting of motions to dismiss in actions against defendants for failure to comply with disclosure requirements of a consumer credit act pertaining to revolving charge accounts. Plaintiffs contend that: (1) the trial court’s rulings that defendants are in “substantial compliance” with the act are erroneous, and (2) the trial court’s construction of the act is erroneous. We affirm.

These cases have been consolidated because they both involve an interpretation of “An Act in relation to the billing of customers under revolving charge accounts”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. Illinois Education Ass'n Local Community High School District 218 v. Board of Education of School District 218Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rice v. Snarlin, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Bee Jay's Truck Stop, Inc. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Callahan v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Kurle v. Evangelical Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. SheehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. O'NEILL v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Department of Public Aid ex rel. Hartigan v. HokinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API