Legal Opinion

Thomas M. Godfrey v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2002No. 01-1647PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge..Appellants Thomas M. Godfrey, et al., brought an action against Pulitzer Publishing Co. (“Pulitzer”) pursuant to the Robinson-Patman Act § 2(a), 15 U.S.C. § 13(a) (1994), claiming that appellee had engaged in anticompetitive sales of its newspaper, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch (“the Post-Dispatch”). The district court 2 granted summary judgment in favor of Pulitzer and the appellants brought this appeal. We affirm.

I. Background

Appellants are branch dealers, or “branchmen,” who purchase copies of the Post-Dispatch from Pulitzer at a discount and resell the newspapers to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. STELWAGON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellee, v. TARMAC ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. S.B.S. Pill Dr., Inc. Savannah B. SwartoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Ballinger v. CulottaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Binkley v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Whitehall Co. v. Merrimack Valley Distributing Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API