Legal Opinion

Strach v. Casino Windsor

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 22, 2004No. 04-74197Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

ROBERTS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal and Subject Matter Jurisdiction. For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.

II. BACKGROUND

Lorraine Strach (“Plaintiff’) alleges she was injured when she fell after contact with an employee of Casino Windsor (“Defendant”), located in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. As a result- of the April 2003 incident, Plaintiff asserts that she had to “endure painful surgery and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hugo Princz v. Federal Republic of GermanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. Gould, Inc., (86-3649), Plaintiff-Respondent, (86-8327) v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann and Trefimetaux, (86-3649), Defendants-Petitioners, (86-8327)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Antares Aircraft, L.P. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, Nigerian Airports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Alan C. Sugarman v. Aeromexico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API