Legal Opinion

Mauian Hotel, Inc. v. Maui Pineapple Company

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1971No. 4950PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ABE, J.

This is a claim for recovery of property damages allegedly caused by the overflowing and bursting of a dam located on the property of the Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd. Initially, the Mauian Hotel, Inc., and approximately twenty others instituted action against Maui Pineapple who in turn moved to bring in two third-party defendants, Austin, Smith & Associates, Inc., and Napili-Kai, Ltd. The third-party plaintiff (Maui Pineapple) contends that Austin-Smith, at the request of Napili-Kai, designed the dam and if there is any liability to plaintiffs arising out of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Rural Fire Protection Company, a Corporation v. William E. HeppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Paul's Electrical Service, Inc. v. BefitelHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Doherty v. Hartford Insurance GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hoke v. PaulHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API