Legal Opinion

Hoke v. Paul

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1982No. 8023PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PADGETT, J.

This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of Appellees Guy A. Paul (Paul) and the County of Hawaii (County). We affirm as to Appellee County of Hawaii and reverse as to Appellee Paul.

The second amended complaint, with respect to which the summary judgment was granted, contained two counts. Count I was essentially an action in defamation concerning two documents prepared and allegedly published by Paul. Count II encompassed not only the two publications in question, but a series of acts commencing some 18 or 19 years earlier and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Towse v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Medeiros v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crowley v. North American Telecommunications Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Mullin v. Washington Free Weekly, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Staheli v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API