Legal Opinion
In re Miranda
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 7, 2011No. C062411PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Damian M. Miranda petitions this court for writ of habeas corpus. He alleges the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) violated his due process rights at a parole-suitability hearing in 2007 because its determination that he was not suitable for parole was not supported by “some evidence” that he remained dangerous. While Miranda’s petition was pending, he was released from prison after the Board found him suitable for parole in a new hearing.
*760Despite his release, Miranda argues that this petition is not moot because, if we find that the Board violated his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 904California Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Arroyo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re ArroyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- In re Scoggins CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. De La Rosa CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Perez CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020