Legal Opinion
Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. Lozier
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided July 23, 1895No. 5,404PublishedCited by 4 opinions
This was a bill filed, under Rev. St. § 4918, by the Palmer Pneumatic Tire Company against Henry A. Lozier, to procure an adjudication determining the rights of the parties under certain interfering patents for inventions.
1Opinion of the Court
BECKS, District Judge.
' This is a proceeding instituted hy the Palmer Pneumatic Tire Company, authorized by section 4918 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, which reads as follows:
“Sec. 4918. Whenever there are interfering patents, -any person interested in any one of them, or in tlie working of the invention claimed under either of them, may have relief against the interfering patentee, and all parties interested under him, hy suit in equity against the owners of the interfering patent; and the court, on notice to adverse parties, and other due proceedings had according to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burrell v. HackleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1888
- Potter v. DixonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1863
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nicholas L. Etten and Chamberlain Corporation v. Lovell Manufacturing Company and Walter L. Kauffman, 2dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Coffield Motor Washer Co. v. A. D. Howe Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1909
- Keystone Trading Co. v. Zapota Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
- Lattig v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905