Legal Opinion
In Re Tucknall
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 6, 1989No. 19-50274PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION ON OBJECTION TO CLAIM
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Bankruptcy Code § 502(a) provides in part that “[a] claim ... is deemed allowed, unless a party in interest ... objects.” These chapter 13 debtors object to the $12,-333.51 proof of claim filed by Connecticut National Bank (CNB) on the ground that interest calculated on a judgment obtained by CNB in state court is excessive. For the reasons that follow, the objection is overruled, and the claim is allowed.
I
On May 15, 1979, the debtors executed a $5,000.00 note in favor of CNB. The note provided that interest was to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cherokee Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Reynolds v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Crest Plumbing & Heating Co. v. DiLoretoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Air Separation, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Parker v. I&F Insulation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Connaught Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Parker v. I&F Insulation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Air Separation, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994